/Type /StructElem /K [1] >> /Type /StructElem >> /Type /Page << As with any discovery request, defense attorneys should be careful to limit their requests only to relevant and reasonably calculated information. /Contents [425 0 R 426 0 R 427 0 R] As computerized translations, some words may be translated incorrectly. /P 444 0 R RESPONSE: Complainant contends that the following relationships to the Complainant are held for persons identified in Interrogatory No. 9:16-cv-80655-rlr-jmh v. ) ) florida atlantic university board of trustees, a/k/a florida atlantic university, et al. ) 152 0 obj >> /Pg 16 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [31] endobj For a more detailed discussion of the invocation of privilege, see. /K [6] /Annots [] 118 0 obj endobj /Pg 34 0 R << [1] >> /S /P In a thorough opinion that cited to and adopted reasoning from courts across the country, the Fourth District denied the plaintiffs petition for certiorari and upheld the trial courts order. /K [3] /Contents [385 0 R 386 0 R 387 0 R] endobj << << endobj /Type /StructElem /Group 354 0 R /P 10 0 R Carefully crafted interrogatories and requests for production may make it more difficult for plaintiffs to prevent the discovery of social media information and more likely that defense attorneys are provided access to information that initiates a favorable resolution of their clients cases. This website uses Google Translate, a free service. /S /P 299 0 obj 58 0 obj Cheat Sheet for Interrogatory and Discovery Objections >> 12 0 obj >> /Pg 16 0 R /S /P /Pg 27 0 R /K [3] 233 0 obj /K [3] /Pg 34 0 R /Pg 23 0 R /Type /Page 93 0 obj 80 0 obj /Pg 14 0 R endobj /Pg 15 0 R << To maximize the likelihood of obtaining requested social media evidence, carefully craft interrogatories and requests for production to encompass relevant and reasonably calculated materials. 123 0 obj >> /P 454 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /Parent 6 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj >> A claim of privilege must be supported by a statement of particulars sufficient to enable the Court to assess its validity. 163 0 obj /K [6] >> /S /P >> /Type /StructElem /Pg 15 0 R Notably, the Fourth District held that, generally, photographs on a social networking site are not privileged, nor are they protected by any right of privacy, regardless of the privacy settings a user elects to establish on their account. 268 0 obj >> #"4H$ _p \BE69 $"*C^_r wI='o*A01o%A%2x^18!3]=$x:0/"vKbUe|^b8E1#S D Gf^>#z_BF\T *DFhQ H$R!UsF%'X['Rad+I7b*:iYtd8I^\}=q&>LE4. /Pg 33 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /P 460 0 R << /Pg 22 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R /P 478 0 R >> 75 0 obj /P 472 0 R << 150 0 obj /K [6] << << endobj Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing (PDF), Handbook for Trial Jurors Serving in the United States District Courts (PDF), Plan for Qualification and Selection of Grand and Petit Jurors (PDF), VII. /Type /StructElem >> /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem << /S /L x+ | /S /P /Type /StructElem /P 462 0 R /Type /Page /Type /Page endobj Specific objections should be matched to specific requests. %%EOF /StructParents 2 /S /P endobj /Pg 33 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P 124 0 obj P. 1.340(c). /S /P %PDF-1.4 endobj /Contents [430 0 R 431 0 R 432 0 R] /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R endobj *Joey is an associate in our Orlando, Florida office who can be reached at 407.505.4680 or jmchindamo@mdwcg.com. endobj 81 0 obj >> /Annots [] << /S /P /K [2] /Pg 18 0 R >> endobj >> /S /P /Pg 15 0 R /K [0] /P 10 0 R << /S /P "bKXkIBC0R"/#HZP{!H1b78 /Pg 26 0 R endobj /K 13 /StructParents 6 179 0 obj /K [462 0 R] /S /P 44 0 obj /S /Table << >> endobj endobj 11 [131 0 R 132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R] << /K [440 0 R 441 0 R 442 0 R 443 0 R 444 0 R 445 0 R 446 0 R 447 0 R 448 0 R 449 0 R /K [4] << /K [14] >> /ViewerPreferences 5 0 R /K [2] >> /Type /StructElem 307 0 obj /P 474 0 R 134 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 443 0 R INTERROGATORY RESPONSES. PDF MIDDLE DISTRICT DISCOVERY - United States Courts 88 0 obj Interrogatories may contain specially defined terms, as long as these definitions are reasonable and not subject to misinterpretation. Aninterrogatory is not objectionable becausean answer to it involves an opinion or con-tention that relates to fact or the applica-tion of law to fact, or would be based oninformation obtained or legal theories de-veloped in anticipation of litigation or inpreparation of trial." /Resources 363 0 R /Type /StructElem << /Pg 20 0 R >> 310 0 R 311 0 R 312 0 R 313 0 R 314 0 R 315 0 R 316 0 R 317 0 R 318 0 R 319 0 R 0000007527 00000 n /Type /StructElem endobj /K 25 << /Pg 30 0 R 37 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R |WxE*V M*Sh%F^erXXB*COS`"Lu /Type /StructElem /P 472 0 R << /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 28 0 R >> /P 10 0 R A party must obtain permission of the court to send more than 10 additional interrogatories. endobj 2011) (holding that postings on a plaintiffs Facebook account, if relevant, are not precluded from discovery because the plaintiff utilized privacy settings); Tompkins v. Detroit Metro. /Type /StructElem 161 0 obj endobj /K [7] /S /P 177 0 obj 178 0 obj << endobj /Pg 17 0 R 300 0 obj >> /Parent 6 0 R /S /P << /P 10 0 R /Pg 13 0 R << endobj 3: Provide a summary of the expected testimony of each witness identified in response to Interrogatory No. /P 472 0 R 0000002693 00000 n /Workbook /Document 154 0 obj endobj endobj /Pg 31 0 R 7 0 obj 40 0 obj 148 0 obj /Group 374 0 R 277 0 obj /Annots [] /Pg 25 0 R << 57 0 obj /Resources 333 0 R /P 472 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> /K [11] << /Type /Page /Pg 34 0 R /P 472 0 R 54 0 obj /K [10 0 R] /K [10] /Pg 26 0 R << /Tabs /S /K [7] /Contents [325 0 R 326 0 R 327 0 R] 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R /Producer /Pg 19 0 R 0000052748 00000 n /Pg 26 0 R << xref The interrogatory also seeks attorney work-product in violation of Code of Civil Procedure sections 2018.020 and 2018.030. /S /P 14 [154 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 290 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R /S /P /S /P /S /P /Annots [] /Type /StructElem /Pg 27 0 R /Type /Page /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem 187 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R /S /LBody 261 0 obj /P 10 0 R endobj 0000014306 00000 n /Pg 20 0 R /S /LBody /P 10 0 R 9 [120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R] /K [9] 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R] stream /Type /StructElem >> << /Worksheet /Part /Type /StructElem >> << /S /P << 22 0 obj /Resources 398 0 R 293 0 obj 76 0 obj /Resources 403 0 R /Annots [] 0000005699 00000 n 173 0 obj /P 472 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /Pg 29 0 R "Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath unless it is objected to, in which event the grounds for objection shall be stated and signed by the attorney making it." Fla. R. Civ. endobj <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 21 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] In 1994, the Trial Lawyers Section of The Florida Bar, the Conference of Circuit Judges, and the Conference of County Court Judges formed a joint committee to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas on how to improve the day- to-day practice of law for trial lawyers and trial judges. /S /P /Pg 34 0 R 0000005536 00000 n /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /StructParents 0 202 0 obj Absent compelling circumstances, failure to assert objections to an interrogatory within the time for answers constitutes a waiver and will preclude a party from asserting the objection in a response to a motion to compel. /Type /StructElem /S /P 147 0 obj 21 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R /S /P /K [13] >> /Pg 23 0 R << << /Pg 13 0 R /ParentTreeNextKey 25 /K [34] /Type /StructElem Because the information shared on a social networking site can be copied and disseminated by another user, the Fourth District wrote, [t]he expectation that such information is private, in the traditional sense of the word, is not a reasonable one.. /P 10 0 R 0c$Q&18r1>O~M =(uS%#+6%P"s1VBddsMq8zBp9\T`Ucm2Ktei{1*["ev4R1fFE#c\OhC!q{e?q 0R'$ o(95 6 [97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R endobj << /S /Span /K [20] /Pg 27 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P % << << /S /P /K [6] /Pg 18 0 R endobj /Annots [] /Pg 19 0 R /K [454 0 R] << /S /P Everything the Plaintiff's Lawyer Needs to Know About Contention /K [5] /Type /StructElem endobj >> /K [5] /Group 404 0 R 111 0 obj >> /P 322 0 R /K [2] /K [2] /Pg 31 0 R 2 0 obj 158 0 obj endobj << 0000005561 00000 n endobj >> /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem 30 0 obj 0000000016 00000 n 304 0 obj endobj << /K [4] endobj /Type /StructElem >> 308 0 obj 325 0 obj /S /P << /S /P /S /P 3 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R endobj /S /P /Contents [345 0 R 346 0 R 347 0 R] 122 0 obj /Type /StructElem /S /P 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R 202 0 R 203 0 R 204 0 R /K [25] endobj << 9 0 obj /S /P << >> /Pg 19 0 R RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. /K [16] 184 0 obj >> endobj >> endobj << /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [1] /P 10 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 23 0 R /S /P /K [7] /Type /StructElem P. 1.280(e). endobj 267 0 obj /A 463 0 R /P 476 0 R << /K [29] endobj /K [13] /Pg 34 0 R endobj << 22 321 0 R 23 322 0 R 24 323 0 R] 201 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem << /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /P << /Tabs /S /P 10 0 R Despite its ubiquity, many peopleincluding plaintiffs in personal injury lawsuitscontinue to share information on their social media accounts that can be a boon to defense counsel but disastrous to their own claims. %PDF-1.5 endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [0] /A 461 0 R /P 474 0 R 34 0 obj /P 472 0 R /K [13] ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. /K [35] After the trial court denied its motion, the defendant filed narrower discovery requests. /A 453 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [2] /Pg 29 0 R 274 0 obj /S /LBody /S /P endobj << >> /P 10 0 R >> /Pg 19 0 R << endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 16 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P >> >> endobj /Type /StructElem /S /L 0000005508 00000 n Not surprisingly, many plaintiffs now object to any discovery requests seeking social media information on grounds including overbreadth, vagueness and violation of the right to privacy. 314 0 obj /Resources 418 0 R /K 27 /S /P 16 [178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 292 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /Tabs /S << /S /P << /K [482 0 R 317 0 R] >> /P 472 0 R Objections A. >> << endobj >> 315 0 obj /K [8] endobj >> 225 0 obj endobj << /Pg 29 0 R << /Type /StructElem 0000000994 00000 n /Pg 22 0 R /P 477 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /K [8] >> endobj /Parent 6 0 R << /Type /StructElem /ID [<35422D32342D38432D41352D35462D31>] >> endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R endobj 289 0 obj << /Annots [] << /K [33] District of Florida, copies of written interrogatories, answers and objections to interrogatories, notices of oral depositions, transcripts of oral depositions, requests for the production of documents and other things, responses to requests for production, matters disclosed pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1), Federal Rules of Civil >> /Type /StructElem 65 0 obj endobj /K [8] /Type /StructElem C. Other Interrogatory Issues | Middle District of Florida | United /Pg 14 0 R >> Please keep this in mind if you use this service for this website. 31 0 obj /P 10 0 R 100 0 obj /K [0] 264 0 R 265 0 R 266 0 R 267 0 R 268 0 R 269 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R] endobj /Contents [410 0 R 411 0 R 412 0 R] /Pg 13 0 R /K [6] /P 451 0 R /K [8] 230 0 obj /P 10 0 R >> Fla. R. Civ. Form 5 - AUTOMOBILE NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF. << 60 0 obj<>stream /P 10 0 R /S /P /Pg 13 0 R /S /P